Yahoo aerial photos There's another cool bit of news on. It's currently Windows-only, but being ported to Java. Using NASA Worldwind solves the copyright problem by using only public-domain data. Not that I'm saying anybody should disrespect any photographer's rights of course. #PERMANENTLY CROP IN INKSCAPE LICENSE#This skew if done with a little artistic license can pretty much totally break any possibility of proving a particular photo was traced. Therefore it's necessary to apply some skew to the photo before starting to trace streets in order to make it match a local map projection more closely. You? - Mark 02:01, (EST) A further word of advice: aerial photos often introduce subtile distortions since they are rarely taken from an exact plum line position above the subject area. Of course I'd welcome a favorable resolution, but I don't really want to put my energy and resources into the test case. They make it very clear in their terms that they believe that they have the rigth to limit derivative works. Jpatokal 01:26, (EST) I think you're underestimating how hard the map data companies are likely to fight. However, I don't think the EU's database rights can be stretched to include raw, unannotated satellite imagery, or otherwise I could argue that any digital picture is a "database" of pixels. a map) from aerial photography are allowed or not is still disputed. The link above says that whether derived works (eg. Still I think it would be awfully difficult to prove that a given map was traced from a given aerial photo unless of course the map were to appear in a project where it's suggested that people use photos from a given source. where the streets of a town are) is not subject to copyright, but there is and unfortunate "database" right in European law. Jpatokal 01:26, (EST) Now that said, the data itself (ie. No, I understand that the photographs are copyrighted, that's not the issue. There's a longer explaination over at OpenStreetMap if you don't believe me. Taking a photo of the Earth is no different whatever in the eyes of the law from taking a photo of a building. Sadly although Google has no copyright to the Earth the people who supply them with photographs and map data do have copyright to those images and that data. Mark, I don't understand your deletion - Google hasn't copyrighted the planet, why do you think using their satellite data for mapmaking is not within our 'rights'? As long as the data is not visible in or attached to the image, I don't see what the issue could possible be. 41 Possible to adjust scale of patterns?.27 Automatic drawing a car/bike route by using list of via points. #PERMANENTLY CROP IN INKSCAPE HOW TO#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |